Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata


DRAFT

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)

#ParticipantAttending
1Davis, Peter
2Hodges, GailYes
3Hughes, AndrewRegrets
4Jones, ThomasYes
5Thoma, AndreasYes
6Williams, ChristopherYes
7Wunderlich, JohnYes

Non-Voting

#ParticipantAttending
1Aronson, MarcYes
2Brudnicki, David
3Dutta, Tim
4Fleenor, Judith
5Gropper, Adrian
6Jordaan, LoffieRegrets
7LeVasseur, Lisa
8Snell, Oliver
9Stowell, Therese
10Tamanini, Greg
11Whysel, Noreen

Other attendees

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress
  • Review draft outline and assign writing tasks

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes

Call to Order

If quorum:

  • Approve agenda
  • Approve minutes
  • Meeting called to order at 13:35
  • The meeting does have a quorum
10 min.Actions or issues from prior meetings

See tasks on Meeting Page

Reviewed completed tasks

40 min.Report content discussion & reviewAll
  • Gail Hodges update on Future Identity Council Digital ID Recommendations
  • Tom points out that most of the interesting use cases are regulated (age for alcohol etc)
    • Does this mean that there should be two 'bundles' - one required by legislation and one that is based on the business interests of the verifier
    • Doesn't like the idea of multiple transactions
  • Interesting convo on terminology and scope of bundles (bundle required by legislation and bundle wanted by verifier, for example)
    • It seems that the UI/UX for presentation and choice to avoid dark patterns and avoid the equivalent of the GDPR cookie consent fiasco (John's opinion) should be a requirement on the Holder's wallet, while clarity on minimizing the data in the required bundle is on the verifier.
5 min.Adjourn

Meeting Adjourned at 13:00

Next meeting

 


Action items

  •  
  •