[WG-P3] Vote: NIST 800-53, Appendix J, P3 comments v5

[Mark Lizar]

Thanks Peter,



On 2 Sep 2011, at 08:58, Peter Capek wrote:

> Should P3 submit these comments to NIST.
>
> Yes       ( X )
> No        ( )
> Abstain ( )
>
> HOWEVER -- please check the last few lines (signatures) before  
> submitting.   Viewing the letter with Open Office, at least, Anna's  
> name appears to be misspelled (sOlomovic), and Mark's name appears  
> twice, the second time with a strange affiliation.
>
>            Peter Capek
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mark at Identity Trust <mark.lizar at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>
> NIST comments - Draft V.5
>
> Thanks for the comments and submission. With no more time for  
> comments or revisions here is a final version of the P3- NIST  
> comments.  These comments show P3 support for the NIST Appendix.
>
> Since there is such a short time allotted to vote and discuss these  
> comments a majority vote is insufficient, the vote needs to also be  
> unanimous.   (Please send your votes to mark at identity-trust.com and staff at kantarainitiative.org 
> ).
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mark Lizar
>
>
> *************************************************************
>
> Should P3 submit these comments to NIST.
>
> Yes       ( )
> No        ( )
> Abstain ( )
>
> (Please vote on the submisison of NIST Comments by 12 pm EST (-04:00  
> UTC) on Friday September, 2nd)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-P3 mailing list
> WG-P3 at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-p3
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20110902/7c7bf166/attachment.html