[WG-P3] NIST 800-53, Appendix J, P3 comments v3
susan.landau at privacyink.org
Thu Sep 1 08:28:10 EDT 2011
On 9/1/11 3:57 AM, Mark at Identity Trust wrote:
> Draft V.3,
> Attached is the latest draft of the comments. If there are any
> additional comments or corrections please send them directly to me by
> 5 pm Thursday (today). If necessary, I will then send out a final
> draft and a ballot.
Re: An additional specific worth considering is the quality of notice be
commesurate to the quality of cosnet.In that when consent or data is not
actively or purposely provided mechanism.
There are two typos above, but also a dangling phrase whose meaning is
unclear. Furthermore, I don't understand how to turn quality of notice
to be commensurate with the quality of consent. Mark, I would
recommend we skip this. The control enhancements provide clear
operational suggestions. It seems to me that the one you are proposing
above does not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WG-P3