[WG-P3] Paris Face to Face (F2F) - Agenda Brainstorm and Draft
Mark Lizar
mark at smartspecies.com
Fri Oct 8 10:17:25 EDT 2010
Greetings All,
I tend to think that the Paris meeting is likely to be the most
important P3 meeting of the year and the most opportune time to direct
P3 focus. I strongly encourage attendance and if this means re-
working schedules, getting up early, or taking the day off work, I
recommend this sort of action. We have covered a lot of ground in the
last year and this meeting provides us with a chance to catalyse as a
WG and direct our extremely valuable efforts for the next year.
Regardless of attendance I suggest a review (or overview) of the P3
Charter and the work submitted so far. In the last year we have had
major contributions in the form of a Rosetta Stone document by Robin
Wilton, the recent submission of a Privacy Framework (for a
credential lifecycle) white paper from the P3- Privacy Framework
SubWG (lead by Trent Adams), as well as submissions to the NSTIC call
for comments which may have important Privacy and Public policy
ramifications. In addition, we have been tracking various efforts and
activities which are coming to a head in the near future.
I suggest that we review this P3 work and present this to interested
participants. Can we ask contributors to present on these submissions
at the Paris F2F ? The idea for this agenda is to have these
presentations in line with a review of the P3 charter and subsequent
charter activities. In this way we can encourage renewed support in
the P3 work group, and also reach out to grow P3 membership.
To brainstorm this idea further I suggest this type of Straw-man
Agenda. Although a strawman is just a starting point for this
discussion, in the end, this meeting will reflect the effort we are
able to contribute to it and the list discussion that we have around
this meeting.
1. Charter Review
a. List our Charter (helpful to educate non-wg members)
i. Becoming an
active convening authority for identity-related privacy and public
policy work - including productive engagement with the CPO,
policymaker, regulatory and adoption communities.
1. Discuss new marketing efforts, IGF – input, plan activities for
this in the next year, (discuss budget)
ii. Liaising and
working with other Kantara groups to represent the privacy and public
policy perspective, and to serve as an ongoing point of reference for
privacy/policy-related questions.
1. Discuss strategic plan in this regards, past efforts, and list
current WG discussion, further evolve plan (discuss budget)
iii. Leading work to
define and develop Privacy Management and Privacy Assurance
deliverables which complement Kantara's initiatives in Identity
Assurance and Identity Governance.
1. List work delivered
a. Rosetta Stone: ( which calls for a collaborative multi-stake-
holder approach to defining and addressing the issues of digital
identity and privacy. As well, we have a had)
b. Privacy Framework – Yet to be reviewed. (Calls for the
development of Privacy Management Framework)
i
. Perhaps we invite other KI-WG to review this document and
participate in this discussion, eg. Looking for leadership to evolve
Privacy Framework
c. Transparency(notice, trust, access) in Digital Identity
Management
iv. Liaising and
working with projects and organizations outside Kantara to further the
same objectives, for example ISO SC27 WG5, ITU-T SG17 Q6, and NASPO.
1. Consolidate list of liaison activities (and materials) over the
last year (prior to F2F) provide these as a hand out/email
2. Report on or review activities that P3 is tracking.
a. ITAC
b. IGF
c. Calls for Papers
3. Plan for external liaison activities over the next year
a. What are upcoming dates that are important to the P3 and KI in
terms of Public Policy?
2. New Business
a. Review outstanding Agenda Items in this regard and remove un-
actioned items from the Agenda to make space for new activities and
focused energy in the next year
b. Goals for the next year
c. Expansion/Revision of Charter (if any)
Note: I have started to draft a schedule of what the agenda would
look like and I have quickly filled in an hours worth of content. I
realise that we dont have enough time to cover every suggestion on the
agenda. Perhaps we can have a show of hands who can attend the
meeting, approve the agenda approach via the list, and drive the
agenda setting by those who are attending and can lead a part of the
meeting?
Best Regards,
Mark Lizar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20101008/23b4d115/attachment-0002.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Agenda Scheduling for Paris F2F.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 41984 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20101008/23b4d115/attachment-0001.doc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20101008/23b4d115/attachment-0003.html
More information about the WG-P3
mailing list