[WG-IDAssurance] KI-IAWG ISO-IEC 29115 Statement

Mon Nov 15 19:18:59 EST 2010

Richard,

Agreed.  I'm choosing to interpret the statement as meaning, "the IAWG
hereby takes the position that KI will try to ensure continued alignment
between ISO/IEC 29115 and the IAF by: .."  Said more briefly another way,
"the IAWG hereby resolves to promote consistency between ISO/IEC 29115 and
the IAF by: ."   We could come up with a better-worded alternative if there
is enough support for withdrawing and resubmitting the motion.  

Ben

From: tScheme Technical Manager [mailto:richard.trevorah at tScheme.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 11:55 AM
To: 'Ben Wilson'
Cc: 'IA WG'
Subject: RE: [WG-IDAssurance] KI-IAWG ISO-IEC 29115 Statement

Ben,

I have no concerns about the word "intent", my problem was (as Jeff put in
his point 4.) I could not get my brain around the grammar as proposed so
reverted to what I thought was discussed on the call.

If you can explain what is meant by "... that KI's policy ... be with the
intent to ensure ...", I'll happily support an 'intent'!

Confusedly yours

Richard

From: Ben Wilson [mailto:ben at digicert.com] 
Sent: 15 November 2010 18:28
To: 'tScheme Technical Manager'; staff at kantarainitiative.org
Cc: 'IA WG'; 'Anna Ticktin'
Subject: RE: [WG-IDAssurance] KI-IAWG ISO-IEC 29115 Statement

Richard,

It appears you have concerns about the weakness of the word "intent" and
would like it to read "policy."  I don't know much about Kantara
policy-setting policy, but I'd assume it is easier to obtain approval of the
language as drafted, regardless of what may have been discussed during last
week's call about the IAWG's proposal that decisions be communicated as
Kantara policy.  So, I am inclined to vote in favor of the proposal so that
we can move forward.  

I cast my ballot as follows regarding the proposed motion as:

____X_____ Yes

_________ No

_________ Abstain

Sincerely yours,

Ben

From: wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
[mailto:wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of tScheme
Technical Manager
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:59 AM
To: staff at kantarainitiative.org
Cc: 'IA WG'; 'Anna Ticktin'
Subject: [WG-IDAssurance] KI-IAWG ISO-IEC 29115 Statement

See below.

Richard

ps where does the atlas come into the vote countJ?

------------------------------------
Richard Trevorah
Technical Manager
tScheme Limited

M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311

http://www.tscheme.org
------------------------------------

The information in this message and, if present, any attachments are
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). The
content of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential and may be
legally privileged. Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is
unauthorised and may be unlawful.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any
attachments and notify the sender as soon as practicable

From: wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
[mailto:wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Anna
Ticktin
Sent: 10 November 2010 21:13
To: IA WG
Subject: [WG-IDAssurance] IAWG eBallot - ISO-IEC 29115 Statement

Hello All-

Attached is the "Statement of the Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance
Working Group's position with regard to ISO/IEC 29115" document [1] .

MOTION: 
Per the discussion on the last IAWG telecon, this is an IAWG motion to
approve and distribute the attached Kantara Initiative IAWG Position
Statement as a guiding principal for liaising activities regarding ISO/IEC
29115.  

TERMS:
Per section 2.6 of the Operating Procedures, this vote requires a simple
majority vote, or atlas 6 affirmative votes to pass.
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/2293776/KI+Oper
ating+Procedures+_V1.1_+2009-10-10.pdf?version=1
<http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/2293776/KI+Ope
rating+Procedures+_V1.1_+2009-10-10.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=125788300
9000> &modificationDate=1257883009000

BALLOT CLOSE DATE:
Please respond to staff [at] kantarainitiative [dot] org with the subject
"KI-IAWG ISO-IEC 29115 Statement" by Friday, 19 November 2010 at 17:00 PST.

PROPOSED VOTE:
If you are currently a VOTING member of the IAWG, please respond with your
vote. If you are uncertain of your voting status, the current roster of
participants is available here:
Roster link:
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idassurance/Participant+Rost
er

I cast my ballot as follows regarding the motion above:

_________ Yes

_X________ No* - I understood that the revised text would be "with regard to
ongoing drafting and conclusion of ISO/IEC 29115 the IAWG has determined
that KI's policy is to ensure continued alignment with the IAF, by"

_________ Abstain

* If NO vote, please include the rationale for your "NO" vote to help
facilitate resolution.

[1] KI IAWG posn re 29115 v0.3.doc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-idassurance/attachments/20101115/95965ce3/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5403 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-idassurance/attachments/20101115/95965ce3/attachment.bin 