[Wg-idassurance] Comments on Service Assessment Criteria
erik at apption.com
Wed Oct 14 12:37:51 EDT 2009
I'd be glad to suggest text changes however, I was wondering how much
flexibility you have with the US Fed TFAP. Are there any possibilities to
refer to national/organizational standards in the ID proofing instead of
specifics or provide per-country recommendations?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Richard G. WILSHER (Zygma)
<RGW at zygma.biz>wrote:
> Those two specific issues should be very deliberately focussed upon by the
> IAWG – any changes should be agreed by the membership and changes should be
> made with caution, given the history of the criteria, the relationship with
> the US Fed TFAP (i.e. if we changed AL2 id-proofing requirements might that
> recognition be invalidated) and the broader question of how these
> undoubtedly US-flavoured criteria are applicable in the real, wider, world.
> Some interesting discussion afoot, methinks, which could be fuelled by
> specific proposals from you for text changes.
> *Richard G. WILSHER
> the Zygma partnership LLC
> **Office: +1 714 965 99 42
> Mobile (USA): +1 714 797 99 42
> Mobile (Eur): +44 77 68 05 41 58
> **RGW at Zygma.biz
> www.Zygma.biz ***
> *From:* wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org [mailto:
> wg-idassurance-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Erik Putrycz
> *Sent:* 13 October 2009 15:07
> *To:* wg-idassurance at kantarainitiative.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Wg-idassurance] Comments on Service Assessment Criteria
> Thanks for your insights on the document, I indeed did miss some important
> content from the current draft.
> My greatest concern is still with the ID proofing process, AL2 is IMO too
> demanding and the ID proofing process for AL3 might not be applicable in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Wg-idassurance