[KI-LC] Draft process guideline for Reports
Frazier-McElveen, Myisha
Myisha.Frazier-McElveen at truestonefed.com
Fri Jan 14 10:05:50 EST 2011
+1 - I agree with John.
Sincerely,
Myisha
Myisha Frazier-McElveen
Practice Manager, Identity Management
703-766-6203 (O) | 240-751-7780 (C)
myisha.frazier-mcelveen at truestonefed.com
<mailto:myisha.frazier-mcelveen at truestonefed.com>
Flexible Solutions, Proven Results
<http://www.truestonefed.com/IAMgmt/EnterpriseIAM.php>
http://www.truestonefed.com/IAMgmt/EnterpriseIAM.php
<http://www.truestonefed.com/IAMgmt/EnterpriseIAM.php>
From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
[mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:00 PM
To: Colin Wallis
Cc: joe at andrieu.net; Kantara Leadership Council Kantara
Subject: Re: [KI-LC] Draft process guideline for Reports
I think the first one with a recommendation to use the approved
templates where possible.
It is an ongoing challenge to make word and other programs happy across
platforms.
John B.
On 2011-01-13, at 1:49 PM, Colin Wallis wrote:
The first option gives greater flexibility for the unexpected..
________________________________
From: eve at xmlgrrl.com
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:21:07 -0800
To: joe at andrieu.net
CC: lc at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [KI-LC] Draft process guideline for Reports
Maybe we should soften that requirement to be a guideline, in
consultation with the LC, or simply a list of the required/prohibited
elements (must have logo, must state IPR regime, can't claim the
document represents all of Kantara...), with a non-normative link to
handy templates.
(I did offer to create other templates; I think we need a
Confluence-native one at the very least.)
Eve
On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
I think it looks good.
The only comment I have is about templates adherence. The ISWG
found the line numbers in the current templates problematic and have
published our most recent reports without them. In one case, it was
impossible to get word to include the line #s in a PDF. In both cases,
we found the line #s significantly detracted from the readability of the
prose. So, although the reports were mostly in the template format,
they did not exactly meet it.
As such, neither of those reports would, technically, meet the
requirements of this process.
Could we either get templates without line numbers or clarify in
the process guideline that variations from the template are acceptable?
-j
Joe Andrieu
joe at andrieu.net
+1 (805) 705-8651
On 1/13/2011 6:16 AM, j stollman wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Colin Wallis <
colin_wallis at hotmail.com> wrote:
Many thanks Eve
I think is 100%.
Cheers
Colin
________________________________
From: eve at xmlgrrl.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:06:11 -0800
To: LC at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: [KI-LC] Draft process guideline for Reports
Any comments?...
Eve
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/LC/LC+Approval+of+Group+
Reports
Background
The Kantara Operating Procedures V1.1
<http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/2293776/KI
+Operating+Procedures+_V1.1_+2009-10-10.pdf> define a Report as:
"Report" shall mean any Work Group or Discussion Group
output that is not a Technical Specification that is approved by a
Majority of the Group and submitted to the Leadership Council. A Report
is not a branded product of the Organization (i.e. it is not submitted
for an All Member Ballot)." [Sec 1.7]
The LC has authority to impose requirements on Reports for LC
approval:
"In addition to development of the Draft
Recommendation(s) authorized in the Work Group Charter the WG may find
it appropriate to develop additional Reports. These Reports shall meet
any requirements established by the LC. Submission of a report to the LC
requires a Simple Majority approval of the WG." [Sec 3.9]
Interpretation
LC approval is not required in order for a group to produce or
publish a draft or final Report as a non-Kantara-wide output.
Only LC-approved group Reports are given publicity through
Kantara marketing communications channels such as its blog and Twitter
feed. Thus, Report submission for LC approval is encouraged.
LC approval serves two purposes: socializing the group's work
among the LC membership (peers of the group's own leadership team), and
formally acknowledging that the report has met the LC's requirements.
LC approval of a Report is a prerequisite for forwarding the
Report to a Kantara Initiative All-Member Ballot.
Requirements for Reports to Be LC-Approved
The requirements (as mentioned in OPs Sec 3.9) that group
Reports must meet for LC approval are as follows:
* The Report must follow a currently published Report
Template
<http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/GI/Publishing+Templates
> as appropriate to its stage of development.
* The Report must be duly approved by a simple majority of
the voting participants of the group.
* The Report meets basic document quality requirements for
spelling, formatting, etc. The LC will work with the group to address
any document quality issues to ensure that the Report is suitable as a
target for Kantara PR and marketing efforts.
Eve Maler
http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756
http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________ LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
_______________________________________________
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
--
Jeff Stollman
stollman.j at gmail.com
1 202.683.8699
________________________________
_______________________________________________
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
_______________________________________________
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________ LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc________________________
_______________________
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20110114/af82e8e7/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2032 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20110114/af82e8e7/attachment-0001.jpe
More information about the LC
mailing list