[KI-LC] Potential synergies with W3C work
joni at ieee-isto.org
Tue Nov 23 13:45:11 EST 2010
I am going through some threads I missed and came to this one. Apologies
for arriving late to this party.
Eve I think the 'wider world' report on LC calls makes great sense and
provides us with a built in point to capture liaison activities across
groups. I would love to see this as an on-going LC topic where we could
also take 'inventory' of the status of our current liaison activities.
Thanks for raising this item.
Kantara Initiative | Managing Director
email: joni @ ieee-isto.org
skype: upon request
Join the conversation on the community@ list -
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
> Thanks for these thoughts and data points, Colin! I like your idea of
> informal liaisons. I could see adding a template bullet for capturing
> status related to the "wider world" of a KI group, though that sort of thing
> could also go in the "other" category of the report. (The UMA WG actually
> now has a standing agenda item in our telecons for "wider world" news, since
> we seem to be engaging with a lot of external folks.)
> On 1 Sep 2010, at 10:01 PM, Colin Wallis wrote:
> > Thanks Eve
> > W3C has an eGov group too, that NZ Gov vaguely keeps track of via it's
> membership in OASIS, where there is an existing top level liaison between
> the two SDOs.
> > The OASIS eGov group has not had a great experience in trying to liaise
> with W3C's. But that may be just the personalities in that particular case
> than any underlying resistance, I don't know.
> > I could foresee DAP being useful to Telco as well.
> > I think a full blown formal liaison is premature, but favour informal
> liaisons in each WG, with perhaps an additional targeted show and tell
> session say every 6 months on the LC agenda, (and maybe tweak the reporting
> template again to enforce reporting on Informal Liaisons?).
> > Cheers
> > Colin
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org [mailto:
> lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler
> > Sent: Thursday, 2 September 2010 1:19 p.m.
> > To: LC at kantarainitiative.org Council Kantara
> > Subject: [KI-LC] Potential synergies with W3C work
> > Recently I noticed that the Device APIs and Policy (DAP) WG work at the
> W3C may have some synergies with the UMA work. Trent suggested that the
> best model for engaging with them is to encourage people (whose affiliations
> allow them to do so) to participate in both forums according to their
> interest. We haven't taken that very far yet, but I did reach out to the
> DAP chairs and we've started to familiarize ourselves with the others'
> > Since other folks doing work at Kantara may be seeing similar synergies
> with W3C, should we use the LC to conduct a kind of lightweight liaison
> function, just to keep aware of who's interested in what where? Does anyone
> have any other suggestions for how to take advantage of such opportunities?
> > Thanks,
> > Eve
> > Eve Maler
> > http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> > http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/evemaler
> > _______________________________________________
> > LC mailing list
> > LC at kantarainitiative.org
> > http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
> > ====
> > CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that
> may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or
> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message
> in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
> and attachments. Thank you.
> > ====
> Eve Maler
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LC