[KI-LC] P3WG Requests for Guidance
Colin.Wallis at dia.govt.nz
Wed Nov 18 16:33:10 EST 2009
Good catch Paul
As one who was party to that thread, I support this. eGov, for one, would find it very useful.
From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org [mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Paul Madsen
Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 4:54 a.m.
To: J. Trent Adams
Cc: LC at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [KI-LC] P3WG Requests for Guidance
out of a recent thread that crossed SSTC and KI eGov lists, I'll suggest
another possible work item for P3 - a white paper exploring explicit
user consent, when is recommended, when not, in its absence, what are
equivalent protections, what different legislations impose/forbid, etc
J. Trent Adams wrote:
> All -
> As a reminder, the Leadership Council was asked by the P3WG for guidance
> on what work items we would like to see them tackle. 
> We spent some time on the last teleconference exploring various ideas.
> The result of the discussion was that we would send around what we
> captured on the call to provide an opportunity for additional comment
> from the group.
> Unless it becomes necessary for the LC as a body to officially endorse
> one or more suggestions, the tenor of the discussion was that we would
> provide these as input the P3WG so that they could consider them on
> their own. Below are the suggestions as captured on the call.
> NOTE: In order to facilitate follow-up discussion, each suggestion is
> attributed to the person who proposed it. Please feel free to correct
> the record if I've inaccurately captured your comments.
> 1. Eve: As illuminated by the GSA/ICAM Identity
> Trust Framework, perhaps the P3WG could explore
> Agreements", perhaps coordinating with IAWG.
> 2. Joe: Following the work of Jeff Jonas about the
> privacy concerns related to "Space Time Travel" ,
> perhaps the P3WG could consider authoring a white
> paper addressing related privacy issues.
> 3. Brett: How to manage liaisons with other external
> bodies with respect to privacy standards (eg. privacy
> maturity capability model at ISO/IEC 29190) 
> 4. Colin: Perhaps the P3WG could provide a proactive
> scan across KI WGs to look for various privacy issues
> and raise flags.
> 5. Bob: Perhaps the P3WG could explore producing a
> white paper on what kind of assurance levels could
> be assigned to various government operations
> (presumably focused on the U.S. government).
> 6. Brett: A useful tool would be a published and
> maintained list of key international public policy
> debates on Identity (i.e. who is doing what work
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
More information about the LC