- Roll call
- Approve minutes of 2012-07-12 meeting
- Feature test progress
- Implementation progress
- Spec progress, review, issues
- New profiling features
- New UMA-style OAuth scopes
- Spec/issues review
- #56: Sample UMA-style OpenID Connect OAuth scopes from George to look at?
- Prioritize current open issues
- Where does "adding new token profiles" fit?
New AI summary
Thomas, Sal, Eve
Capture business-oriented use cases.
Needs to be written up.
|2012-07-12||Eve||Open||Work on Binding Obligations comments.|
|2012-07-19-1||Thomas||Open||Work on issue #61 editorial instructions.|
|2012-07-19-2||Domenico||Open||Propose issue #57 "promissory claims" profile.||This might be layered on top of the OpenID Connect claim profile.|
|2012-07-19-3||Eve||Open||Finally put feature tests on the OSIS wiki.|
Approve minutes of 2012-07-12 meeting
Minutes of 2012-07-12 meeting APPROVED.
Feature test progress
Eve has put new participant and solution entries on the OSIS wiki for Fraunhofer AISEC (but they probably need fixing). Issues raised by the Eve/Trey feature test work are now recorded in issue #61 (see AI 2012-07-19-1).
No news since last week.
Spec progress, review, issues
Eve had closed a couple of the big issues that we resolved: #13, #14, #56, and #58. We quickly walked through many of the current open issues and the newly added text.
Thomas suggested, regarding the Binding Obligations references in the profiles section: Should we broaden to mention things like trust frameworks as well? Should we broaden our discussion of profiles in general (in the intro to Section 5) to clarify that profiling has "BLT" (business/legal/technical) aspects? Let's not add the word "Technical" to "Profile" here, but we do need more discussion.
As of 12 Jul 2012 (pre-meeting), quorum is 6 of 11.
- Catalano, Domenico
- Hardjono, Thomas
- Machulak, Maciej
- Maler, Eve
- Moren, Lukasz
- Szpot, Jacek